emphasis · covariate biology
phylogenetic isolation as a diversification covariate · F. Richter · USI · 2026-07-22
In one lineD is a lineage's phylogenetic isolation relative to its contemporaries — the signed deviation of its time-since-last-speciation from the clade mean. It is the same quantity that underlies evolutionary distinctiveness and, inversely, tip diversification rate; its coefficient βD is the model's handle on the century-old question of whether speciation is age-structured.
Since Yule (1925) the default model of a diversifying clade has been a memoryless birth process: every lineage speciates at the same instantaneous rate, independent of how long it has existed. Nee, May & Harvey (1994) built the standard likelihood of a reconstructed tree on exactly this assumption. Yet real phylogenies persistently violate it in two ways a constant-rate process cannot produce: diversification slows down toward the present (Pybus & Harvey's γ<0), and clades harbour long, isolated terminal branches — living fossils — lineages that have persisted for tens of millions of years without splitting. Two repairs dominate: making the rate depend on standing diversity (diversity-dependence), and making it depend on lineage age — protracted speciation, where speciation takes time to complete (Rosindell et al. 2010; Etienne & Rosindell 2012), and explicit age-dependent birth–death models (Hagen et al. 2018). The covariate D operationalises this second repair at the level of a single lineage.
Let ts be the last time lineage s speciated and Is=t−ts its isolation time — the length of its current pendant edge. With N lineages alive and mean isolation M:
So D is simply the centered pendant edge: how much longer (D>0) or shorter (D<0) a lineage has gone without speciating than its living peers. Because ΣsDs=0 by construction, D carries no information about the clade as a whole — only about the relative position of a lineage within it.
This ties D to two familiar measures. For a present-day lineage, Is is its terminal branch length, so D at the tips is the centered terminal branch: the raw material of evolutionary distinctiveness (Isaac et al. 2007 — long pendant = distinct, "on the EDGE") and, inversely, of the tip diversification rate DR (Jetz et al. 2012 — short pendant = fast recent diversification). D>0 is thus a relatively isolated, relictual lineage; D<0 a recently-radiated one. Evaluated at every branching event, D makes this instantaneous and relative.
| Clade | pendant (Myr) | crown (Myr) | pendant / crown |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salamanders (Caudata) | 427.8 | 429.7 | 0.996 |
| Night lizards (Xantusiidae) | 103.3 | 104.3 | 0.990 |
| Toucans (Ramphastidae) | 77.5 | 78.2 | 0.991 |
| Ibises (Threskiornithidae) | 50.2 | 50.8 | 0.987 |
| Petrels (Procellariidae) | 79.3 | 80.7 | 0.983 |
| Pikas (Ochotonidae) | 44.8 | 45.7 | 0.981 |
| Iguanas (Iguanidae) | 58.7 | 67.7 | 0.867 |
Table 1. The most isolated lineage in a sample of atlas clades: its pendant edge as a fraction of crown age. A ratio near 1 means a lineage isolated for essentially the clade's entire history.
Placed in the rate, λs = f(⋯ + βDDs), the coefficient βD tests age-dependent speciation directly, and its sign is interpretable:
Because ΣsDs=0, βD acts only on which lineage splits, never on the clade's overall rate: a pure test of internal, age-structured heterogeneity, cleanly separated from diversity-dependence (carried by N). This is why D and N are the two orthogonal covariates — one asks when the clade diversifies, the other which lineages within it do.
D is not an abstract statistical residual: it is relative phylogenetic isolation — the quantity conservation biology calls evolutionary distinctiveness and macroevolution reads as tip rate, made instantaneous and mean-centered. The atlas shows it is right-skewed, richness-independent, and dominated by a tail of ancient relicts — a covariate biologically legible on its own and, through βD, one that turns the model into a direct test of whether speciation is age-structured. With N it forms a two-covariate model whose axes answer the two questions a phylogeny can pose: the tempo of diversification, and the age structure of who diversifies.
References. Yule (1925) Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 213:21. Nee, May & Harvey (1994) Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 344:305. Pybus & Harvey (2000) Proc. R. Soc. B 267:2267. Isaac, Turvey, Collen, Waterman & Baillie (2007) PLoS ONE 2:e296 (EDGE). Jetz, Thomas, Joy, Hartmann & Mooers (2012) Nature 491:444 (DR). Rosindell, Cornell, Hubbell & Etienne (2010) Ecol. Lett. 13:716; Etienne & Rosindell (2012) Syst. Biol. 61:204. Hagen, Hartmann, Steel & Stadler (2018) Syst. Biol. 67.
Data: 42 Phylo-Atlas chronograms, 4,906 events; all numbers computed, not estimated.